| Integrase 
Inhibitor Raltegravir (Isentress) Compares Favorably to Efavirenz (Sustiva) at 
144 Weeks in Treatment-naive Patients 
 
  | The 
integrase inhibitor raltegravir (Isentress), in combination with tenofovir/lamivudine, 
continued to exhibit potent anti-HIV activity at 144 weeks in treatment-naive 
patients, suppressing viral load as well as efavirenz (Sustiva) but associated 
with fewer side effects. | 
 By 
Liz Highleyman At 
the 5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, 
Treatment, and Prevention (IAS 2009) this week in Cape Town, South Africa, 
researchers from Peru, Canada, and the U.S. presented a poster describing results 
from an ongoing Phase 2 study comparing the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability 
of raltegravir 
versus efavirenz in previously 
untreated patients. In 
this double-blind, multicenter study, 198 treatment-naive participants were randomly 
assigned to receive 400 mg twice-daily raltegravir (the first 48 weeks were dose-ranging 
from 100 to 600 mg twice-daily) or 600 mg once-daily efavirenz, both combined 
with tenofovir (Viread) and lamivudine 
(3TC; Epivir).  Results |   | At 
144 weeks, in a non-completer = failure analysis, 144, 78% of the 160 patients 
receiving raltegravir and 76% of the 38 patients taking efavirenz had sustained 
HIV RNA suppression < 50 copies/mL. |  |   | Only 
3 patients met the study's definition of virological failure after week 96, 2 
in the raltegravir arm and 1 in the efavirenz arm. |  |   | Participant 
in both arms experienced similar CD4 cell gains (252 vs 233 cells/mm3, respectively). |  |   | Drug-related 
clinical adverse events were less frequent in the raltegravir arm compared with 
the efavirenz arm, at 54% vs 76%, respectively. |  |   | Overall, 
the most common adverse events, reported by more than 10% of participants, were 
nausea, dizziness, and headache, which occurred with similar frequency in the 
2 arms. |  |   | Neuropsychiatric 
adverse events were less frequent in the raltegravir compared with the efavirenz 
arm (35% vs 61%). |  |   | Laboratory 
adverse events were uncommon in both treatment groups. |  |   | Raltegravir 
had a minimal effect on total cholesterol, LDL ("bad") cholesterol, 
and triglyceride levels. | 
 Based 
on these findings, the researchers concluded," In ART-naive patients, raltegravir 
with [tenofovir/lamivudine] had potent and durable antiretroviral activity, which 
was similar to [efavirenz/tenofovir/lamivudine] and was sustained to week 144." "Raltegravir 
was generally well tolerated, they added. "[D]rug related adverse events 
were less frequent in patients treated with raltegravir compared to efavirenz." These 
data indicate that raltegravir continues to be effective at 144 weeks, consistent 
with previously reported 48-week data. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved 
raltegravir for treatment-naive HIV patients earlier this month. Hospital 
Nacionale Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru; Merck Research Laboratories, West Point, 
PA; Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York, NY; Hospital Nacionale Edgardo 
Rebagliati, Lima, Peru; Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand; Canadian Immunodeficiency 
Research Collaborative, Toronto, Canada; Fundación Santafe de Bogota University 
Hospital, Bogota, Colombia; Clinical Research Puerto Rico, Inc., San Juan, Puerto 
Rico; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA. 7/21/09 ReferenceE 
Gotuzzo, BY Nguyen, M Markowitz, and others. Sustained antiretroviral efficacy 
of raltegravir as part of combination ART in treatment-naive HIV-1 infected patients: 
144-week data. 5th International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Pathogenesis, 
Treatment, and Prevention. Cape Town, South Africa. July 19-22, 2009. Abstract 
MOPEB030.
                              
 | 
 |