Prompt 
        Testing and Expanded Treatment Linked to Reduce HIV Incidence in San Francisco, 
        Washington DC, and Vancouver
        
        
          
           
            |  |  |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  | 
                 
                  | SUMMARY: 
                    More widespread HIV testing and early antiretroviral 
                    therapy (ART) not only have clear benefits for the treated 
                    individual, but may also benefit the larger community by reducing 
                    the number of new HIV infections, according to 3 studies from 
                    North America presented at the 17th Conference on Retroviruses 
                    and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 
                    2010) last month in San Francisco. |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  |  |  |  | 
        
        By 
          Liz Highleyman
          
          Effective ART that suppresses viral load to an undetectable level dramatically 
          reduces the risk of forward HIV transmission. Mathematical models suggest 
          that universal voluntary testing and widespread treatment -- either 
          according 
          to current guidelines or for everyone 
          infected regardless of CD4 cell count -- could essentially halt 
          the spread of the epidemic, but it is not yet clear how well this would 
          work in the real world.
          
          The 3 studies presented at CROI give the first indication that expanded 
          testing and treatment are viable and can help reduce the spread of the 
          disease in high-income countries with overall low prevalence (though 
          specific areas may have pockets of high prevalence).
          
           San 
          Francisco
          
        
           
            | 
                 
                  |  |   
                  | 
                       
                        | Moupali 
                            Das-Douglas (Photo by Liz Highleyman) |  |  | 
        
        In the 
          first study, Moupali Das-Douglas from the San Francisco Department of 
          Public Health and colleagues looked at the effect of community viral 
          load -- or viral load across an entire community -- on HIV incidence. 
          They hypothesized that the recent decrease in community viral load in 
          San Francisco would be associated with a reduction in new HIV infections.
          
          The researchers used San Francisco's comprehensive HIV/AIDS surveillance 
          system, which includes mandatory reporting of viral load data, as well 
          as a CDC mathematical model of new infections to calculate community 
          viral load, and to examine associations between community viral load 
          and new HIV cases between 2004 and 2008. 
          
        They looked 
          at 2 different measures of community viral load: total community viral 
          load was defined as the sum of the most recent viral load measurements 
          from all reported HIV+ individuals in a particular population. Mean 
          community viral load was defined as the average of the most recent viral 
          load measurements, that is, the sum divided by the number of people.
          
          New HIV cases consist of 3 groups: people who received a new diagnosis 
          of an existing HIV case (e.g., due to stepped-up testing capturing a 
          backlog of previously infected but untested individuals), new reports 
          of existing cases, and HIV incidence, or people who actually were recently 
          infected. "We really don't have a very precise method of determining 
          incidence," Das-Douglas noted.
          
          Results
        
           
            |  | After 
              remaining stable at about 23,000-24,000 copies/mL during 2002-2005, 
              mean community viral load started to fall, reaching 15,000 copies/mL 
              in 2008, a 40% drop. | 
           
            |  | This 
              decline was associated with a significant decrease in new HIV cases, 
              from 796 in 2004 to 434 in 2008, approaching a 50% decline. | 
           
            |  | The 
              number of people estimated to be infected but unaware of their status 
              also fell considerably, from 24% to 15%. | 
           
            |  | Estimated 
              new or recent infections (according to the mathematical model) fell 
              by about one-third between 2006 and 2008 (from 930 to 620 people), 
              but this did not reach statistical significance. | 
           
            |  | By 
              the end of the study period, an estimated 80% of newly diagnosed 
              people were linked to care, about 90% of these were on ART, and 
              about 75% of treated people had achieved undetectable viral load. | 
        
        "Increased 
          antiretroviral treatment options and coverage, as well as increasing 
          HIV status awareness," may have led to decreases in community viral 
          load in San Francisco during the study period," the investigators 
          concluded. "Findings support the hypothesis that wide-scale early 
          ART can have a preventive effect at a population-level."
          
          Because community viral load is "temporally upstream" of new 
          HIV infections, public health departments should consider adding it 
          to routine HIV surveillance to track the epidemic and evaluate the effectiveness 
          of HIV prevention and treatment interventions, they suggested. 
          
          Speaking at an accompanying press conference, Das-Douglas described 
          community viral load as a "virometer," or a way to take the 
          temperature of a community. In response to a question, she noted that 
          the decline in HIV cases occurred even as rates of other sexually transmitted 
          infections rose, suggesting that people may be practicing serosorting 
          (having sex only with partners of the same HIV status). 
        "This 
          helps us see how well treatment is working, but also how well prevention 
          is working, so can target interventions to those at highest risk," 
          she said. "What gets measured gets managed."
          
          Washington, DC
          
          Amanda Castel from George Washington University School of Public Health 
          and Health Services and colleagues reported findings from an analysis 
          of the effect of increased testing in Washington, DC, which has the 
          highest HIV/AIDS rate in the U.S. -- an estimated 3% overall seroprevalence. 
          
          
          In 2006, the DC Department of Health launched an initiative to promote 
          routine HIV testing with improved linkage to care throughout the city 
          (following the newly implemented CDC testing guidelines). This included 
          opt-out testing at medical facilities, community campaigns to encourage 
          testing, and testing and treatment in jails.
          
          The researchers assessed trends in the number of HIV tests performed, 
          the number of people treated, clinical indicators (CD4 cell count and 
          HIV viral load) at the time of HIV diagnosis, and changes in numbers 
          of new cases from 2004 to 2008.
          
        Results
        
           
            |  | The 
              number of HIV tests performed annually rose dramatically, from about 
              20,000 in 2004, to 35,000 in 2006 at the start of the testing push, 
              to 93,000 in 2009. | 
           
            |  | The 
              number of HIV diagnoses (according to name-based reporting) increased 
              significantly, from about 1093 in 2004 to 1280 in 2007 (the last 
              year with complete data), a decrease of 17%. | 
           
            |  | Increased 
              testing shortened the mean time between estimated date of infection 
              and diagnosis. | 
           
            |  | The 
              percentage of people diagnosed with AIDS who did not learn their 
              status until they developed advanced disease fell from 66% in 2004 
              to 57% in 2008. | 
           
            |  | Median 
              CD4 count at the time of diagnosis increased significantly, from 
              216 cells/mm3 in 2004 to 343 cells/mm3 in 2008, or by nearly 60%. | 
           
            |  | The 
              percentage of people who developed symptomatic AIDS within 1 year 
              after diagnosis decreased from 47% in 2004 to 28% in 2008. | 
           
            |  | The 
              percentage of newly diagnosed individuals accessing care rose from 
              about 75% in 2004 to about 95% in 2008. | 
        
        "Expanded 
          routine HIV testing in Washington, DC has been associated with increased 
          identification of HIV/AIDS cases, more rapid entry into care as measured 
          by time to initial CD4 count, percent or viral load, and earlier diagnosis 
          as indicated by the initial CD4 count itself, and the decreasing proportion 
          of late testers among AIDS cases," the researchers continued. "Continued 
          surveillance will help determine whether these findings will translate 
          into improved clinical outcomes and reduced HIV transmission."
          
          Vancouver
          
          Finally, Julio Montaner from the British Columbia Centre for Excellence 
          in HIV/AIDS and colleagues looked the link between expanded ART coverage, 
          community viral load, and decreased HIV transmission among injection 
          drug users (IDUs) in the Downtown Eastside district of Vancouver, thought 
          to be the area with the highest HIV/AIDS rate in Canada. The researchers 
          provided results for the entire province of British Columbia, but overall 
          rates largely reflect the situation in urban Vancouver.
          
          ART (and medical services in general) are available free of charge for 
          all British Columbia residents. A targeted effort to expand ART use 
          among IDUs was started in 2007. HIV testing, ART distribution, and HIV 
          viral load measurements in the province are centralized, allowing the 
          researchers to obtain comprehensive data from administrative and medical 
          records. 
          
          Results
        
           
            |  | The 
              number of HIV tests performed in British Columbia annually rose 
              from 104,229 in 1994, to 137,980 in 1996 (the first years of the 
              new program), to 182,151 in 2008. | 
           
            |  | New 
              HIV diagnoses in British Columbia dropped overall from 1996 to 2008, 
              but the annual decrease plateaued in the early 2000s, before commencing 
              a slower second decline, falling from 440 cases in 2004 to 370 in 
              2009. | 
           
            |  | The 
              rate of new diagnoses among IDUs specifically, however, continued 
              to decline steeply, falling from 150 in 2004 to 80 in 2009. | 
           
            |  | The 
              number of people receiving ART doubled from about 2500 in 2000 to 
              about 5000 in 2009. | 
           
            |  | Average 
              community viral load declined over the same period, with the proportion 
              with > 50,000 copies/mL decreasing and the percentage with < 
              500 copies/mL increasing (from about 40% in 2004 to about 75% in 
              2009). | 
           
            |  | Here, 
              too, rates of other sexually transmitted infections increased even 
              as HIV cases declined. | 
        
        These 
          findings, the researchers concluded, "demonstrate an association 
          between expanded [ART] coverage, decreased provincial plasma viral load, 
          and decreased new HIV diagnoses," which were temporally related 
          to a treatment outreach effort targeting IDUs. Montaner suggested the 
          decrease was likely due to more ART use rather than behavior change, 
          since needle exchange and other harm reductions were widely implemented 
          well before the decline began.
          
          Taken together, while these studies cannot prove a causal link between 
          increased testing, more widespread treatment, reduced community viral 
          load, and the rate of new HIV infections, they do suggest that expanded 
          access to testing and care is providing community-wide benefits.
          
          Abstract 33: San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, 
          CA; University of California, San Francisco, CA.
          
          Abstract 34: George Washington University School of Public Health and 
          Health Services, Washington, DC; HIV/AIDS Admin, District of Columbia 
          Dept of Health, Washington, DC.
        Abstract 
          88LB: British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, 
          BC, Canada.
        3/12/10
        References
        M Das-Douglas, 
          P Chu, G-M Santos, and others. Decreases in Community Viral Load Are 
          Associated with a Reduction in New HIV Diagnoses in San Francisco. 17th 
          Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2010). 
          San Francisco. February 16-19, 2010. Abstract 33.
        A Caste, 
          R Samala, A Griffin, and others. Monitoring the Impact of Expanded HIV 
          Testing in the District of Columbia Using Population-based HIV/AIDS 
          Surveillance Data. 17th Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic 
          Infections (CROI 2010). San Francisco. February 16-19, 2010. Abstract 
          34.
        J Montaner, 
          E Wood, T Kerr, and others. Association of Expanded HAART Coverage with 
          a Decrease in New HIV Diagnoses, Particularly among Injection Drug Users 
          in British Columbia, Canada. 17th Conference on Retroviruses & Opportunistic 
          Infections (CROI 2010). San Francisco. February 16-19, 2010. Abstract 
          88LB.