HCV 
        Protease Inhibitor Boceprevir Improves Response for Treatment-Naive and 
        Non-responders
        
        
           
            |  |  |  | 
           
            |  | 
                 
                  | SUMMARY: 
                    Merck's investigational hepatitis C 
                    virus (HCV) protease inhibitor boceprevir 
                    improved sustained response rates when combined with pegylated 
                    interferon plus ribavirin in both previously untreated patients 
                    and those who were non-responders or relapsers after prior 
                    therapy, according to 2 Phase 3 studies presented at the 18th 
                    Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 
                    2011) this month in Boston. |  |  | 
           
            |  |  |  | 
        
        By 
          Liz Highleyman
        
        
           
            |  | 
           
            | 
                 
                  | Mark 
                      Sulkowski(Photo: 
                      Liz Highleyman)
 |  | 
        
        The advent 
          of direct-acting antiviral agents that interfere with various steps 
          of the HCV lifecycle will usher in a new era of treatment for chronic 
          hepatitis C. The current standard-of-care, pegylated 
          interferon (Pegasys or PegIntron) plus ribavirin, leads to sustained 
          virological response (SVR), or a cure, less than half the time for individuals 
          with hard-to-treat HCV genotype 1. 
        The first 
          such drugs -- boceprevir and Vertex's HCV protease inhibitor telaprevir 
          -- are expected to be approved this year. Initially, they will be used 
          in combination with standard-of-case therapy, but all-oral regimens 
          without interferon are currently being studied.
        At CROI, 
          researchers presented final data from 2 pivotal Phase 3 studies of telaprevir: 
          SPRINT-2, which enrolled previously untreated patients, and RESPOND-2, 
          which enrolled prior non-responders and relapsers. These results were 
          previously 
          presented at the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 
          (AASLD) meeting this past fall.
        SPRINT-2 
          and RESPOND-2 did not include people with HIV -- making these presentations 
          unusual for CROI -- but HIV specialists recognize the need to get up 
          to speed on hepatitis C treatment, since many HIV positive people are 
          coinfected with HCV. As recently 
          reported, the conference also featured the first data on telaprevir 
          for HIV/HCV coinfected individuals.
        SPRINT-2 
          
          
          SPRINT-2 included 1097 treatment-naive HCV genotype 1 patients (about 
          60% men). Participants were divided into cohorts according to race, 
          as people of African descent do not respond as well to interferon-based 
          therapy. One cohort included 159 black patients, while the other included 
          938 people of other racial/ethnic groups ("non-black"). Most 
          had high HCV viral load and nearly 10% had advanced liver fibrosis.
        All participants 
          started a regimen of 1.5 mcg/kg/week pegylated 
          interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron) plus 600-1400 mg/day weight-adjusted 
          ribavirin for a 4-week lead-in period. After this, they were randomly 
          assigned to continue on pegylated interferon/ribavirin, either alone 
          or in combination with 800 mg boceprevir 3-times-daily. 
        Boceprevir 
          recipients were further allocated to receive either the triple combination 
          for a fixed duration of 48 total weeks or response-guided therapy. In 
          the latter arm, all participants stopped boceprevir at week 28. Those 
          with undetectable HCV RNA during weeks 8-24 stopped all drugs, while 
          those with continued detectable HCV viral load stayed on pegylated interferon/ribavirin 
          through week 48.
          
          Results 
          
        
           
            |  | In 
              an intent-to-treat analysis, SVR rates were significantly higher 
              in the boceprevir arms -- 66% with fixed-duration treatment and 
              63% with response-guided therapy -- compared with the standard therapy 
              arm (38%). | 
           
            |  | In 
              all arms, white patients had higher response rates than blacks: 
              68% vs 53% in the fixed duration boceprevir arm, 67% vs 42% in the 
              response-guided therapy arm, and 40% vs 23% in the standard therapy 
              arm. | 
           
            |  | The 
              relapse rate was 9% in both boceprevir arms, compared with 22% in 
              the standard therapy group. | 
           
            |  | Almost all boceprevir recipients with undetectable HCV RNA during 
              weeks 8-24 achieved SVR: 96% with fixed-duration boceprevir, 97% 
              with response-guided therapy. | 
           
            |  | Among 
              boceprevir participants who had detectable HCV viral load at least 
              once during weeks 8-24, still 74% achieved SVR in both arms. | 
           
            |  | The 
              most common treatment-related adverse events across arms were fatigue, 
              headache, and nausea. | 
           
            |  | Anemia 
              and dysgeusia (odd taste sensations) were more common in the boceprevir 
              groups than in the standard therapy group. | 
           
            |  | Rates 
              of discontinuation due to adverse events, however, were similar 
              across arms: 16% in the standard therapy arm, 16% in the boceprevir 
              fixed-duration arm, and 12% in the response-guided therapy arm. | 
        
        Based on 
          these findings, the researchers concluded that a regimen of boceprevir 
          plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin "significantly increased SVR" 
          compared with standard therapy alone, and HCV RNA at week 8 could be 
          used to determine duration of pegylated interferon/ribavirin.
          
          RESPOND-2
          
          RESPOND-2 enrolled 400 treatment-experienced genotype 1 patients, both 
          prior non-responders and relapsers (undetectable at the end of treatment 
          followed by viral rebound). About two-thirds were men, 12% were black, 
          and 12% had liver cirrhosis.
        Again, all 
          participants initially received pegylated interferon/ribavirin standard 
          therapy for a 4-week lead-in period. They were then randomly assigned 
          to continue on pegylated interferon/ribavirin either alone or in combination 
          with 800 mg 3-times-daily boceprevir. 
          
          Boceprevir recipients were assigned to either stay on triple therapy 
          through week 48 or use response-guided therapy. In the latter group, 
          participants stopped boceprevir at week 36; those with undetectable 
          HCV RNA at week 8 stopped all treatment, while those with detectable 
          viral load continued on pegylated interferon/ribavirin through week 
          48.
          
          Results 
          
        
           
            |  | In 
              an intent-to-treat analysis, patients in the boceprevir arms had 
              significantly higher SVR rates -- 67% with fixed-duration therapy 
              and 59% with response-guided therapy -- than those in the standard 
              therapy arm (21%). | 
           
            |  | People 
              with undetectable HCV RNA at week 8 had high SVR rates in all arms: 
              88% with fixed-duration boceprevir, 86% with response-guided boceprevir, 
              and 100% with standard therapy. | 
           
            |  | People 
              taking boceprevir, however, were about 6 times more likely to have 
              undetectable HCV RNA at week 8 (46%-52% vs 9%). | 
           
            |  | In all arms, previous relapsers had higher SVR rates than prior 
              non-responders: 75% vs 52% with fixed-duration boceprevir, 40% vs 
              69% with response-guided boceprevir, and 29% vs 7% with standard 
              therapy. | 
           
            |  | Here 
              too, the most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, and 
              nausea. | 
           
            |  | Anemia 
              occurred about twice as often in the boceprevir arms: 46% with fixed-duration 
              boceprevir, 43% with response-guided boceprevir, and 20% with standard 
              therapy. | 
           
            |  | Serious 
              adverse events likewise occurred about twice as often in the boceprevir 
              arms: 14%, 10%, and 5%, respectively. | 
        
        The investigators 
          concluded that boceprevir added to pegylated interferon/ribavirin "significantly 
          increased SVR." 
          
          They added that boceprevir could be used to treat patients with all 
          types of interferon non-responsiveness, and that fixed-duration and 
          response-guided therapy were "equally effective."
          Investigator affiliations:
          
          Abstract 115: John Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; 
          Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA; Gastroenterology/Hepatology/Certified 
          Endoscopy Ctrs, Alexandria, VA; St Louis Univ School of Medicine, St 
          Louis, MO; AO Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milan, Italy; Hannover Medical 
          School, Hannover, Germany; Ctr for the Study of Hepatitis C, Weill Cornell 
          Medical College, New York, NY; Univ of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; 
          Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ; Ctr Hosp Univ de Nancy, Univ Henri Poincaré 
          Nancy 1, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
          
          Abstract 116: Henry Ford Hosp, Detroit, MI; St Louis Univ School of 
          Medicine, St Louis, MO; Alamo Medical Research, San Antonio, TX; Univ 
          Paris, Hosp Beaujon, Clichy, France; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 
          TX; Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany; 
          Cedars-Sinai Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA; Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ; 
          Hosp Univ Vall d'Hebrón, Barcelona, Spain.
        3/15/11
        References
        M Sulkowski, 
          F Poordad, J McCone, et al. BOC Combined with P/R for Treatment-naive 
          Patients with HCV Genotype-1: SPRINT-2 Final Results. 18th Conference 
          on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2011). Boston. February 
          27-March 2, 2011. Abstract 
          115.
        S Gordon, 
          B Bacon, E Lawitz, et al. HCV RESPOND-2 Final Results: High Sustained 
          Virologic Response among Genotype-1 Previous Non-responders and Relapsers 
          to pegIFN/RBV when Re-treated with BOC + PEGINTRON/RBV
          18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2011). 
          Boston. February 27-March 2, 2011. Abstract 
          116.