By 
                      Liz Highleyman 
                      
                      Over 
                      years or decades, chronic hepatitis B can lead to decompensated 
                      liver disease, characterized by symptoms such as ascites 
                      (abdominal fluid accumulation), portal vein hypertension, 
                      and hepatic encephalopathy. 
                    People 
                      with advanced liver disease are considered difficult to 
                      treat, but this population has an urgent need for effective 
                      therapy to control viral replication and slow further progression 
                      of liver damage. A growing body of research has looked at 
                      antiviral therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease.
                    
                    Yun-Fan 
                      Liaw from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan and colleagues
                      conducted a study to compare the safety and tolerability 
                      of tenofovir, tenofovir plus emtricitabine (the 2 drugs 
                      in the Truvada 
                      coformulation approved for HIV treatment), and entecavir. 
                      
                    This 
                      Phase 2 study included 112 chronic hepatitis B patients 
                      with decompensated liver disease. At baseline the median 
                      Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score was 7 and median MELD scores 
                      ranged from 10.5 to 13.0. Most participants (84%) were men, 
                      the median age was 52 years, just over half were Asian, 
                      and 65% were initially hepatitis B "e" antigen 
                      (HBeAg) negative. About one-third had creatinine clearance 
                      suggesting impaired kidney function at baseline; advanced 
                      liver disease is a risk factor for kidney dysfunction and 
                      tenofovir can cause kidney problems in at-risk individuals. 
                      
                    Participants 
                      were randomly allocated (2:2:1) to the 3 treatment arms. 
                      None had previously used the study drugs; entecavir recipients 
                      who previously used or were resistant to lamivudine 
                      (Epivir-HBV) took a higher dose. The investigators primarily 
                      looked at safety, in particular "tolerability failure" 
                      -- adverse events that resulted in permanent treatment discontinuation 
                      -- and markers of kidney function. 
                    They 
                      also assessed response based on HBV viral load suppression, 
                      ALT liver enzyme normalization, and HBeAg loss and seroconversion. 
                      Patients with insufficient viral suppression (> 
                      400 copies/mL) at weeks 8 or 24 or later could begin open-label 
                      tenofovir/emtricitabine, but were considered "failures" 
                      for the 48-week efficacy analysis.
                    Results
                    
                       
                        |  | Tolerability 
                          failure was infrequent and statistically similar in 
                          all study arms: 6.7% with tenofovir monotherapy, 4.4% 
                          with tenofovir/emtricitabine, and 9.1% with entecavir. | 
                       
                        |  | Overall, 
                          8 patients taking tenofovir, 3 taking tenofovir/emtricitabine, 
                          and 3 taking entecavir discontinued their assigned study 
                          drug prior to week 48; 10 switched to open-label tenofovir/emtricitabine. | 
                       
                        |  | Protocol-defined 
                          kidney impairment was also uncommon, occurring in 8.9%, 
                          6.7%, and 4.5%, respectively -- not a significant difference. | 
                       
                        |  | Most 
                          participants across all study arms reported adverse 
                          events, but adverse event profiles and laboratory abnormalities 
                          were consistent with advanced liver disease, with no 
                          unexpected safety signals. | 
                       
                        |  | 6 
                          patients died (no deaths considered related to study 
                          drugs) and 6 received liver transplants with no HBV 
                          recurrence. | 
                       
                        |  | At 
                          week 48, similar proportions of patients taking tenofovir 
                          (70.5%) and entecavir (72.7%) had HBV DNA < 400 copies/mL, 
                          rising to 87.8% in the tenofovir/emtricitabine combination 
                          arm. | 
                       
                        |  | These 
                          proportions rose to 76.7%, 87.8%, and 85.7%, respectively, 
                          when participants who switched to open-label tenofovir/emtricitabine 
                          were included. | 
                       
                        |  | Similarly, 
                          57% taking tenofovir and 55% taking entecavir had normal 
                          ALT, rising to 76% in the combination arm. | 
                       
                        |  | 21% 
                          of tenofovir recipients and 27% of tenofovir/emtricitabine 
                          recipients experienced HBeAg loss, compared with none 
                          of the entecavir recipients. | 
                       
                        |  | Corresponding 
                          rates of HBeAg seroconversion were 21%, 13%, and 0%, 
                          respectively. | 
                       
                        |  | CTP and MELD scores improved in all treatment arms. | 
                       
                        |  | No 
                          participants developed resistance to any study drug. | 
                    
                    Based 
                      on these findings, the authors wrote, "All treatments 
                      were well tolerated in patients with decompensated liver 
                      disease due to chronic hepatitis B with improvement in virologic, 
                      biochemical, and clinical parameters."
                    "Although 
                      the study was not designed to detect differences in efficacy 
                      among the 3 treatment regimens, standard chronic hepatitis 
                      B efficacy assessments (e.g., viral suppression, normalization 
                      of ALT, HBeAg/HBsAg loss, and seroconversion) were generally 
                      improved at 48 weeks in the majority of patients in each 
                      treatment group, as were measures of severity of liver disease 
                      and dysfunction (CTP and MELD scores)," they elaborated 
                      in their discussion. "As anticipated, each treatment 
                      arm produced reductions in serum HBV DNA and normalization 
                      of ALT levels consistent with results obtained in chronic 
                      hepatitis B patients without decompensation."
                    "The 
                      percentages of patients with confirmed changes in serum 
                      creatinine and/or serum phosphorus were not significantly 
                      different among patients who received [tenofovir] compared 
                      to [entecavir], suggesting similar renal [kidney] safety," 
                      they added.
                    "In 
                      summary, both [tenofovir]-containing regimens were well 
                      tolerated in these decompensated chronic hepatitis B patients, 
                      with no significant differences compared to [entecavir] 
                      with respect to tolerability failures or confirmed changes 
                      in renal parameters," the researchers concluded. "These 
                      data demonstrate the safety of these treatments through 
                      48 weeks in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis 
                      B and evident therapeutic benefit in all groups."
                    Investigator 
                      affiliations: Liver Research Unit, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 
                      Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 
                      Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, 
                      Kaohsiung Medical Center, Chang Gung University College 
                      of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi 
                      Hastanesi, Izmir, Turkey; Ippokration General Hospital of 
                      Athens, Athens, Greece; Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, 
                      Ontario, Canada; National Chen Kun University Hospital, 
                      Tainan, Taiwan; Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Warsaw, 
                      Poland; Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA; Gordon 
                      and Leslie Diamond Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Hospital 
                      General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital 
                      La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum, 
                      Berlin, Germany; Gilead Sciences, Durham, NC; University 
                      of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
                    1/18/11
                    Reference
                      Y-F Liaw, I-S Sheen, C-Mo Lee, and others. Tenofovir 
                      disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir 
                      in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B liver 
                      disease. Hepatology 53(1): 62-72 (Abstract). 
                      January 2011.