Large 
              Meta-analysis Finds No Link between Efavirenz (Sustiva) and Birth 
              Defects
              
              
              By 
                Liz Highleyman
                
                 Current 
                antiretroviral 
                treatment guidelines recommend that HIV 
                positive pregnant women should not take efavirenz because 
                animal studies indicated a small risk of congenital abnormalities, 
                or birth defects. This recommendation was strongest for the first 
                3 months of gestation, the period when fetal organs are formed.
Current 
                antiretroviral 
                treatment guidelines recommend that HIV 
                positive pregnant women should not take efavirenz because 
                animal studies indicated a small risk of congenital abnormalities, 
                or birth defects. This recommendation was strongest for the first 
                3 months of gestation, the period when fetal organs are formed.
              Nathan 
                Ford from Médecins Sans Frontières and colleagues 
                performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of available evidence 
                regarding the link between efavirenz and pregnancy outcomes. 
              The 
                study authors searched medical literature databases through January 
                2010 and searchable websites of major HIV conferences through 
                February 2010 to identify observational cohort studies reporting 
                birth outcomes among women exposed to efavirenz during the first 
                trimester of pregnancy. 
              The 
                primary endpoint was birth defects of any kind. The researchers 
                also looked at neural tube defects (a type of birth defect seen 
                in efavirenz animal studies), spontaneous abortions or miscarriages, 
                induced abortions or pregnancy terminations, stillbirths, and 
                preterm deliveries. 
                
                Results  
                
              
                 
                  |  | 16 
                    studies met the inclusion criteria, including 11 prospective 
                    cohort studies and 5 retrospective reviews; about half were 
                    conducted in resource-limited settings. | 
                 
                  |  | 9 
                    prospective studies reported birth defect rates among babies 
                    born to women exposed or not exposed to efavirenz-containing 
                    regimens during the first trimester. | 
                 
                  |  | 35 
                    birth abnormalities were reported among 1132 live births to 
                    women exposed to efavirenz during early pregnancy. | 
                 
                  |  | 289 
                    birth defects were reported among 7163 live births to non-efavirenz-exposed 
                    women. | 
                 
                  |  | The 
                    overall incidence rate of birth defects among babies born 
                    to women exposed to efavirenz was about 3% -- within ranges 
                    reported for the general population in both industrialized 
                    and developing countries. | 
                 
                  |  | Across 
                    all studies, 1 neural tube defect (meningomyelocele) was observed 
                    with first trimester efavirenz exposure, for an incidence 
                    rate of 0.08%. | 
                 
                  |  | The 
                    pooled relative risk of birth defects among women who used 
                    efavirenz during early pregnancy was 0.87, not significantly 
                    different from the rate among unexposed women (P = 0.45). | 
              
               Based 
                on these findings, the study authors concluded, "We found 
                no increased risk of overall birth defects among women exposed 
                to efavirenz during the first trimester of pregnancy compared 
                with exposure to other antiretroviral drugs."
              "Prevalence 
                of overall birth defects with first trimester efavirenz exposure 
                was similar to the ranges reported in the general population," 
                they continued. "However, the limited sample size for detection 
                of rare outcomes such as neural tube defects prevents a definitive 
                conclusion."
                
                Investigator affiliations: Médecins Sans Frontières, 
                South Africa; Centre for 
                Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Research, University of Cape 
                Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Pediatric, Adolescent and Maternal 
                AIDS Branch, Center for Research for Mothers and Children, Eunice 
                Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 
                National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; London School of 
                Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences, 
                Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada; Red Cross Children's 
                hospital, Cape Town, South Africa; Faculty of Health Sciences, 
                University of Ottawa, Canada; Geneva University Hospital, HIV 
                Unit, Service of Infectious Diseases, Geneva, Switzerland.
                
                6/15/10
              Reference
                N Ford, L Mofenson, K Kranzer, and others. Safety of efavirenz 
                in first-trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
                of outcomes from observational cohorts. AIDS 24(10):1461-1470 
                (Abstract). 
                June 19, 2010.