Does 
                  Nevirapine Lower Viral Load More than Efavirenz? 
                  
                  
                  
                  By 
                    Liz Highleyman
                    
                   All 
                    widely used antiretroviral 
                    therapy (ART) regimens reduce plasma HIV RNA levels to 
                    a so-called "undetectable" level in most patients, 
                    typically defined as below 50 copies/mL. But ultra-sensitive 
                    viral load tests show that almost all HIV positive people 
                    have a low level of residual virus despite treatment.
All 
                    widely used antiretroviral 
                    therapy (ART) regimens reduce plasma HIV RNA levels to 
                    a so-called "undetectable" level in most patients, 
                    typically defined as below 50 copies/mL. But ultra-sensitive 
                    viral load tests show that almost all HIV positive people 
                    have a low level of residual virus despite treatment.
                  S. 
                    Haim-Boukobza and colleagues from France performed a retrospective 
                    analysis to compare levels of residual HIV viremia below 50 
                    copies/mL among patients receiving the NNRTIs nevirapine or 
                    efavirenz, both in combination with a NRTI backbone of tenofovir 
                    (Viread) plus emtricitabine 
                    (Emtriva).
                  The 
                    study included 165 HIV positive participants observed after 
                    they had achieved and maintained virological suppression (< 
                    50 copies/mL) for at least 6 months using standard tests. 
                    A total of 75 were using nevirapine and 90 were taking efavirenz.
                  The 
                    researchers measured residual plasma viral load using an ultra-sensitive 
                    assay with a limit of quantification of 1 copy/mL. They then 
                    compared the proportions of patients in the nevirapine and 
                    efavirenz groups who suppressed HIV RNA below this level.
                    
                    Results 
                    
                  
                     
                      |  | Participants in the nevirapine group had a viral load 
                        below 1 copy/mL significantly more often than people in 
                        the efavirenz group (81.3 vs 55.6%, respectively; P < 
                        0.001). | 
                     
                      |  | In 
                        a multivariate analysis controlling for potential confounding 
                        factors, the only factors independently associated with 
                        viral suppression below 1 copy/mL were: | 
                     
                      |  | 
                           
                            |  | Using 
                              nevirapine rather than efavirenz: odds ratio (OR) 
                              2.85 (P = 0.005); |   
                            |  | Duration 
                              of viral suppression on ART: OR 2.07 (P = 0.005). |  | 
                  
                  To 
                    explain these findings, the study authors noted that nevirapine 
                    has good penetration into anatomic "compartments" 
                    that can serve as viral reservoirs, such as the brain and 
                    genital tract. Controlling HIV in these compartments may prevent 
                    the virus from escaping and starting to replicate in the blood.
                    
                    However, the investigators cautioned that the clinical relevance 
                    of having a viral load below 1 copy/mL is unclear. Further 
                    research is needed to determine, for example, how low-level 
                    residual virus affects systemic immune activation and inflammation, 
                    which have been linked to premature immune system aging and 
                    increased risk of non-AIDS conditions such as cardiovascular 
                    disease.
                    
                    Investigator affiliations: Laboratoire de Virologie, AP-HP, 
                    Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 
                    UPMC Univ Paris, France; Laboratoire de Virologie, AP-HP, 
                    CHU Saint Antoine, France; UPMC Univ Paris, France; Service 
                    de Maladies Infectieuses, AP-HP, Hopital Saint-Antoine, France; 
                    Boehringer Ingelheim, France; Service de Médecine Interne, 
                    AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpetrière, 
                    Paris, France; Service de Maladies Infectieuses, AP-HP, Groupe 
                    Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, 
                    France; UPMC Univ Paris, INSERM U943, Paris, France.
                    
                    1/7/11
                  Reference
                  S 
                    Haim-Boukobza, L Morand-Joubert, P Flandre, and others. Higher 
                    efficacy of nevirapine than efavirenz to achieve HIV-1 plasma 
                    viral load below 1 copy/ml. AIDS (Abstract). 
                    December 13, 2010 (Epub ahead of print).